YUDU Sentinel Blog

Looking Back at 2025: How Accurate Were Our Out-of-Band Communication Predictions?

Written by Edward Jones | 04 Dec 2025

At the beginning of this year, we published our annual forecast:
Predictions for Out-of-Band Communications in 2025

As 2025 draws to a close, it’s the perfect moment to evaluate how those predictions fared — not merely as a scorecard, but to understand how the market evolved, how organisations responded to new pressures, and how the concept of out-of-band communication matured across industries.

In many ways, 2025 has been the year that out-of-band communication shifted from niche cybersecurity jargon to a mainstream resilience requirement. But not every prediction materialised in the way we expected.

Here is our honest reflection.

1. Prediction: “AI will play a major role in out-of-band communication workflows.”

**Outcome: Partially accurate — progress was real, but pragmatic rather than transformative.

We anticipated that AI would begin shaping crisis communication through automated routing, threat-aware escalation paths, intelligent priority filtering, and situational assistance for responders.

What actually happened

AI did play a role in OOB comms this year — but subtly:

  • AI-powered summary and transcription tools became common in secure chat and video environments.
  • Some platforms introduced AI-enhanced alert prioritisation and automated categorisation during incidents.
  • Organisations experimented with AI-assisted decision support, especially in post-incident reviews and reporting.

But the “AI-centric crisis assistant” we predicted — capable of guiding responders through complex, unfolding events — hasn’t yet become a standard feature.

Verdict

✔ Correct direction, but adoption remained incremental rather than revolutionary.

2. Prediction: “Secure out-of-band channels will become central to incident response and compliance.”

**Outcome: Completely accurate — and one of the defining trends of 2025.

This prediction has arguably been the biggest success.

What actually happened

Across operational resilience, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance, organisations increasingly acknowledged that traditional channels (Teams, Slack, email, SMS) cannot be relied upon during:

  • cyberattacks
  • insider threat investigations
  • system outages
  • identity compromise
  • regulatory audits
  • situations where off-channel communication rules apply

In 2025, two pressures accelerated the shift:

1. Regulatory and enforcement activity

  • Off-channel communication failures became a headline issue for regulators.
  • Compliance teams began mandating segregated communication channels for sensitive discussions.

2. Increased frequency of cyber incidents

As ransomware and identity attacks surged, organisations recognised the need for independent, always-available communication not reliant on corporate infrastructure.

Result: Secure OOB communication has moved from “resilience best practice” to formal organisational policy in many sectors.

Verdict

✔ Fully realised prediction.

3. Prediction: “Out-of-band communication will expand beyond senior security teams to wider operational groups.”

**Outcome: Partially accurate — adoption is growing, but still in the maturation phase.

Our prediction was that OOB communication would broaden beyond cybersecurity, incident response, and executive crisis teams to become a tool used across more of the organisation.

What actually happened

In 2025, we definitely saw more instances of broader departmental use, including:

  • facilities and buildings teams using OOB channels during evacuations
  • business continuity teams relying on them during disruptions
  • HR, legal, and governance teams using them for sensitive discussions
  • operational staff adopting them when primary systems were unavailable

These examples reflect genuine progress - and a noticeable shift in awareness.

However, it’s also clear that OOB communication is still not as widely understood or embedded as we would like. Many organisations are only just beginning to recognise the need for a trusted, segregated communication channel. The alarm has been sounded, but widespread organisational adoption is still developing.

We are seeing the early signs of OOB becoming a multi-department necessity, but the market is still in a maturation phase, with plenty of work ahead to ensure that all critical teams understand when — and why — to move off the corporate grid during an incident.

Verdict

Prediction partially realised — strong movement, but full maturity still to come.

4. Prediction: “OOB platforms will evolve into full collaboration environments — video, whiteboarding, document sharing, and more.”

**Outcome: Partially accurate — significant progress, but not industry-wide.

We anticipated that OOB tools would grow beyond secure text messaging into integrated emergency workspaces.

What actually happened
  • 2025 saw meaningful advancements:
  • Several platforms (Sentinel among them) introduced secure video conferencing, enabling escalation from chat to video within the OOB environment.
  • Screen sharing, role-based spaces, and live guidance for onsite staff became practical features.
  • Recording, transcription, and audit-quality evidence capture became standard in compliance-driven organisations.
  • Integrations such as whiteboarding tools and secure livestreaming expanded capability during major incidents.

However, industry-wide:

  • Many vendors still offer basic messaging only.
  • Few provide real-time collaborative editing or multi-modal information sharing.
  • Fully integrated “incident command rooms” within OOB platforms remain early-stage.
Verdict

Clear movement toward the vision, but uneven adoption across the sector.

5. Prediction: “Organisations will adopt offline-first and mobile-first OOB communication capabilities.”

**Outcome: Partially accurate — mobile-first yes, offline-first not widely.

Mobile-first

Spot on.

  • The majority of OOB communication platforms experienced a significant uptick in mobile app usage.
  • Organisations demanded OOB capabilities specifically optimised for crisis response in the field.
Offline-first

This did not materialise as strongly:

  • While some platforms support offline access to contacts or essential documents,
  • true offline messaging with delayed sync is still rare in secure environments.

Technical and security constraints remain a barrier.

Verdict

✔ Mobile-first prediction accurate — offline-first prediction still premature.

6. Prediction: “Satellite-based or alternative-path communication would emerge as part of OOB strategies.”

**Outcome: Did not meaningfully materialise.

We speculated that LEO satellite networks or mesh-based emergency connectivity might begin to influence OOB strategy.

What actually happened

Despite growing interest in satellite communications, OOB communication platforms have not widely adopted satellite integration. Organisations still overwhelmingly rely on:

  • secondary mobile networks
  • independent Wi-Fi / cellular backup routes
  • out-of-band apps running on consumer or corporate devices

The concept remains relevant for remote industries — but not mainstream.

Verdict

✖ Prediction did not occur in 2025.

What 2025 Revealed About the State of Out-of-Band Communication

1. OOB communication is no longer optional

Organisations now view OOB comms as a baseline requirement for cyber resilience, operational continuity, and compliance.

2. The market is maturing - but unevenly

A gap is widening between:

  • platforms offering only encrypted chat, and
  • platforms offering secure multi-channel, multi-modal collaboration.

3. Compliance is now a major driver

From DORA to off-channel communication rules, regulatory expectations are pushing organisations to formalise OOB strategies.

4. Crisis communication is expanding beyond cyber incidents

Building evacuations, site shutdowns, service disruptions, and safeguarding events all now default to OOB channels.

5. The future lies in integrated, real-time collaboration

2025 built the foundations: video, screen sharing, role-based workspaces, integrated tools.

The next step is fully-fledged incident command environments operating outside corporate platforms.

Conclusion: A Year of Consolidation, Clarity, and Direction

Looking back, most of our predictions held true — particularly around:

  • the mainstreaming of OOB communication
  • regulatory momentum
  • mobile-first adoption
  • expansion into non-cyber operational teams
  • the early rise of integrated collaboration tools

A few predictions, such as satellite integration and offline-first capabilities, may still be a few years out.

But overall, 2025 has been the year that out-of-band communication matured into a strategic organisational capability, rather than a specialist tool used during rare crises.